Overview

CodeRifts vs Spectral

Capability CodeRifts Spectral
Primary focus Full API governance API design linting
Setup One-click GitHub App CLI install + ruleset file
API design linting Built-in rules Highly customizable rulesets
Custom linting rules Via .coderifts.yml Full JS/TS custom functions
Breaking change detection Yes No (lint only)
Change intent classification Structural / Behavioral / Security / Performance tags No
Detection confidence scoring High / Medium / Low No
Risk scoring (0–100) 4-dimension model No
Policy enforcement Budgets, freeze, approvals No
Security analysis Yes No
Governance health score Yes No
Generator-aware risk Yes No
PR comment report 20+ sections Via CI integration
AsyncAPI support Not yet Yes
OpenAPI 3.0 / 3.1 Yes Yes
CLI tool npm npm
REST API Yes No
Pricing Free + Pro $49/mo Free (Apache-2.0)

Key difference#

Spectral answers: "Does this spec follow our design standards?" — it validates a single spec against a ruleset. CodeRifts answers: "What changed between the old and new spec, how risky is it, and should we allow it?" — it compares two versions and provides governance. Many teams use both: Spectral for design-time linting, CodeRifts for merge-time governance.

When to choose Spectral#

  • You need deeply customizable linting rules written in JavaScript or TypeScript
  • You work with AsyncAPI specs and need linting support for event-driven APIs
  • You only need design-time validation, not merge-time breaking change detection
  • You want a free, self-hosted tool with no vendor dependency

When to choose CodeRifts#

  • You need breaking change detection, not just linting — Spectral does not diff specs
  • You want risk scoring and policy enforcement to prevent high-risk changes from merging
  • You want a zero-config GitHub App instead of maintaining CI pipelines and ruleset files
  • You need security analysis, migration cost estimation, and governance health scoring
  • You want both linting and governance in a single tool

Updated

Was this page helpful?